Posts Tagged ‘side effects’

Dangers of Aspartame | Diet Sodas – PART 2

August 14th, 2009

Yesterday, in the first part of this Aspartame series, we uncovered a comprehensive list of many of the Aspartame-related symptoms that have been reported to the FDA. In this section, we’re going to look at some of the reasons why Aspartame has been proven to be dangerous to the human (and animal) health.

How Aspartame Affects the Body

Aspartame is a neurotoxin whose by-products (explained below) can bind to specific receptors within the brain and nervous system. Because of this, Aspartame appears to cause slow, silent damage, especially in the brain and nervous system, in those unfortunate enough to not have immediate reactions to it. For such people, it may take one year, 5 years, 10 years, or 40 years, but it seems to cause some reversible and some irreversible changes in health over long-term use.

The real danger with Aspartame consumption, it now seems, pertains to pregnant women and the developing fetus. A startling 2007 animal study in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives showed that rats fed roughly twice the “acceptable daily intake” (ADI) amount of aspartame from the 12th day of fetal life until their natural death had significant increases in malignant lymphomas/leukemias and mammary tumours!

Although the study was conducted on rats (not humans) and at a dosage higher than the FDA’s ADI levels, it is the second study from the same researchers to show Aspartame’s cancer-causing potential, especially when administered during fetal development.

In their previous study from 2006, Dr. Morando Soffriti and his team showed that Aspartame is a multipotential carcinogenic agent, even at a daily dose of 20 mg/kg of bodweight (milligrams per kilograms per body weight), much less than the current ADI for humans in Europe (40 mg/kg of bodyweight) and in the United States (50 mg/kg bodyweight).

On the basis of these research results, the Italian research team recommended a re-evaluation of the present guidelines on the use and consumption of Aspartame as “urgent and cannot be delayed.”

These studies provide alarming findings on Aspartame, even if they were conducted on rats. Their merit lies in the fact that the dosages used were similar to what most humans would normally consume and that they studied the rats for the entirety of their lives, not just for 1 or 2 years like many flawed studies showing Aspartame’s safety have used.

Aspartame is a compound molecule and its effects on the body can be studied on numerous levels. To that point, it is helpful to understand that upon ingestion, Aspartame breaks down into 3 components: methanol, phenylalanine, and aspartic acid.

Methanol…Formaldehyde…and Formic Acid

Methanol, also known as wood alcohol, comprises 10% of Aspartame and is considered toxic if consumed frequently.

Most of the methanol in Aspartame is absorbed and quickly converted into formaldehyde, and then to formic acid. While some scientists (and interested companies such as Monsanto and Ajinomoto) believe that the metabolism of aspartame into methanol does not damage the body, other experts disagree.

Their disagreement stems from the fact that Aspartame-containing beverages have no ethanol to prevent the conversion to the lethal methanol. In natural products, methanol never appears alone. In every case, it is balanced by the presence of ethanol, which helps to block the body’s enzymes from converting methanol into formic acid.

The researchers also believe that even low levels of methanol (and its by-products formaldehyde and formic acid) can accumulate in the brain, liver, and kidneys of rats while also proving toxic to humans.

Once in the body, methanol is converted to formaldehyde, and then to formic acid. These 2 final by-products of methanol metabolism are well-known toxins! Along these lines, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has stated that methanol:

“…is considered a cumulative poison due to the low rate of excretion once it is absorbed. In the body, methanol is oxidized to formaldehyde and formic acid; both of these metabolites are toxic.”

Formaldehyde is a deadly neurotoxin and a known cancer-causing substance. It causes damage to the retina of the eyes, interferes with DNA replication, and can lead to birth defects.

Formic acid is toxic because it inhibits a key mitochondrial enzyme, depriving the body’s cells from oxygen, resulting in metabolic acidosis (which is associated with bone density loss, kidney problems, and cancer), among a variety of other metabolic disturbances.

According to the EPA, the recommended limit of methanol consumption is 7.8 mg/day. But really, how much of a poison is safe to ingest?? A 1-litre Aspartame-sweetened beverage contains about 56 mg of methanol – that’s about 7 times the EPA’s recommended limit! Maybe 1-litre is excessive for most. So why not consider that a single 12 oz. can of diet coke contains 20 mg of methanol. So either way, you lose!

Phenylalanine and Aspartic Acid

Phenylalanine and aspartic acid, which comprise 90% of aspartame, are amino acids normally used by the body’s cells when supplied by the foods we eat. Phenylalanine is an essential amino acid that is needed for normal growth and tissue maintenance, but sustained high blood levels of phenylalanine can lead to brain damage.

This is of particular concern to roughly one out of 20,000 children born with phenylketonuria or PKU. These children cannot metabolize phenylalanine properly, so it builds up to dangerous levels in their brains.

For this reason, it is law in the United States for Aspartame-containing products to contain a warning of the presence of phenylalanine.

Aspartic acid belongs to a class of chemicals that in high concentrations act as an excitotoxin, inflicting damage on brain and nerve cells. Aspartatic acid does not normally cross the blood-brain barrier in most parts of the brain without active uptake by specific transporters, yet high levels of this excitotoxin has been shown in numerous animal studies to cause damage to areas of the brain unprotected by the blood-brain barrier, leading to variety of degenerative diseases.

While some experts agree that typical use of aspartame does not spike aspartic acid to extremely high levels in adults, they are particularly concerned with its potential effects in infants and young children, as they have undeveloped blood-brain barriers.

It’s a far stretch to think that small children will consume diet sodas because they want to lose weight, but parents should pay attention to infant formulas and other infant foods that may contain Aspartame, even at small doses. More importantly, mothers-to-be should seriously refrain from putting any Aspartame in their bodies in light of the startling “fetal” study alluded to earlier.

Summing Up

Without a doubt, the three breakdown products of Aspartame are all toxic at high doses. But even at small doses, why would you put a poison into your body? Would you put even a small dash of paint thinner (a deadly toxin) into your morning smoothie if it tasted sweet? Of course not!

Counter-arguments have been put forth by experts such as Joe Schwarcz, author of “An Apple a Day”, who claim that the typical Aspartame user consumes far less than the FDA’s “acceptable daily intake” (ADI) rendering Aspartame more or less harmless. But let’s not forget about the corruption inherent in the FDA that led to the approval of Aspartame in the first place or the fact that roughly 100 studies have demonstrated serious detrimental neurological effects from frequent use of Aspartame, even at a lower than ADI levels!

Any chemical that is chronically ingested will accumulate over time. Whether the body can properly metabolize it or not will depend on the health of the body and its major filtering (ie. the liver) and enzyme systems.

Unfortunately, based on most peoples’ current state of poor health, their compromised liver, kidney, and immune function, and their depleted enzyme levels from eating dead foods, it is highly unlikely that, in the long run, their bodies will not show the effects of chronic contamination!

In the case of Aspartame, it has been said that roughly 60 days are required for its by-products to be eliminated from the human body! That’s quite the decay time for a chemical that is often consumed on a daily basis by millions of dieting individuals.

There’s the information. Now, the choice is yours. I hope you make the right one!

 

References:

Soffriti, et al. (2007). Lifespan Exposure to Low Doses of Aspartame Beginning During Prenatal Life Increases Cancer Effects in Rats Environment Health Perspectives 115: 1293-1297.

Soffritti, et al. (2006). Aspartame induces lymphomas and leukemias in rats. European Journal of Oncology, 10(2): 107-116.

Trocho, C. et al. (1998). Formaldehyde derived from dietary aspartame binds to tissue components in vivo. Life Sci, 63(5):337-49.

http://www.epa.gov/

Liesivuori J, Savolainen H (September 1991). “Methanol and formic acid toxicity: biochemical mechanisms”. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 69 (3): 157–63.

Olney, J. (1994). “Excitotoxins in Foods”. Neurotoxicology 15 (3): 535–544.


Aspartame and Why You Shouldn’t Drink Diet Coke – PART 1

August 13th, 2009

The creation, and subsequent introduction, of the man-made “poison” called Aspartame is one of the greatest downfalls of mankind over the last 50 years! That is quite a bold statement but it’s true.

I wanted to share this “whistle blower” information with you because it is a subject that has negatively impacted many people I know. Aspartame is deadly and highly political and you’re about to find out why…

Similar to MSG, Aspartame has been pushed onto the market to satisfy the wallets of key individuals and organizations with a vested interest in its success. 

It is the hallmark ingredient of many diet sodas including Diet Coke. After this 2-part series on Aspartame’s side effects you may reconsider ever drinking another diet soda. It definitely has no place in a healthy diet.

Aspartame is an artificial sweetener that is marketed under a number of trademark names, including Tropicana Slim, Equal, NutraSweet, Spoonful, and Canderel. In the European Union, it is also known under the E number (additive code) E951.

Millions of people have reported symptoms and ill effects after ingesting Aspartame. In fact, in 1995, FDA Epidemiology Branch Chief Thomas Wilcox reported that Aspartame complaints represented 75% of all reports of adverse reactions to substances in the food supply from 1981 to 1995.

Aspartame Side Effects

Here are some of the wonderful symptoms that have been reported: seizures and convulsions, dizziness, tremors, migraines and severe, headaches, memory loss, slurred of speech, confusion, numbness or tingling of extremities, chronic fatigue, depression, insomnia, irritability, panic attacks, rapid heart beat, tachycardia, asthma, chest pains, hypertension, nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, swallowing pain, itching, hives, allergic reactions, menstrual problems, impotency and sexual problems, food cravings and weight gain, hair loss / baldness or thinning of hair, burning urination & other urination problems, bloating, joint pain and brain tumours.

But wait, there’s more! Keep reading to discover the scary ones.

Considering Aspartame’s detrimental effects on the body, it is shockingly still found in more than 6,000 consumer foods and beverages sold worldwide; including, sugar-free chewing gums, some brands of chewable vitamins, and many table condiments.

Most commonly, though, it is the acclaimed artificial sweetener in diet soft drinks, originally gaining mass appeal because its caloric yield is negligible, while still providing a great deal of sweetness. Aspartame is 180 times sweeter than sugar, without the high energy value of sugar. Food manufacturers instantly saw this as an opportunity to put traditional sugar on the backburner and jump on the “low sugar” bandwagon in response to the growing obesity epidemic beginning in the 1980s. Aspartame is, unfortunately, also one of the sugar substitutes used by people with diabetes.

Shady Science

It should be noted that not all scientific studies have shown Aspartame to be dangerous to humans. Of 164 Aspartame studies relevant to human safety, 74 have had aspartame industry-related sponsorship, while 90 have been funded without any industry money.

Not surprisingly, of the 90 non-industry-sponsored studies, 83 (92%) have identified one or more problems with Aspartame, with 6 of the studies that showed no problems being conducted by the FDA. Shortly, you will learn why even FDA-conducted studies should be considered with caution.

Ironically, of the 74 Aspartame industry-sponsored studies, all 74 (100%) claimed that no problems were found with Aspartame!

The Birth of a Monster

Aspartame was discovered accidentally in 1965 by James M. Schlatter, a chemist working for pharmaceutical giant G.D. Searle & Company (now Pfizer, Inc.). Schlatter had synthesized Aspartame in the course of producing an anti-ulcer drug and discovered its sweet taste mistakenly when he licked his finger, which had accidentally become tainted with a touch of the new chemical.

However, it wasn’t until several years later, in 1981, that Aspartame was approved for use in dry foods. For several years, the FDA refused to approve it because of the seizures and brain tumors the harmful sugar substitute was producing in lab animals.

In 1980, the FDA convened a Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) consisting of independent advisors whose responsibility it was to examine the reported relationship between Aspartame and brain cancer. The PBOI concluded that Aspartame does not cause brain damage, but it did recommend against approving aspartame at that time, citing unanswered questions about cancer in laboratory rats.

Shortly after, The Bressler Report, which compared all the available raw data and summary data on Aspartame against the manufacturer’s FDA submission, found missing raw data, numerous errors, and discrepancies in the available data. Regardless, the FDA chose to ignore Bressler’s report.

Wow, what a surprise!

Amazingly, at that point in time, there was no requirement in place in FDA regulations to include brain research in the approval process! Only cancer research was deemed important enough to be considered by the FDA during the approval process.

Prior to 1981, then FDA commissioner, Jere E. Goyan would not approve the use of aspartame due to several studies documenting increase cancers in rats. However, his reign quickly ended on the first day of Ronald Reagan’s presidency in 1981.

Here’s What Happened…

Upon Reagan’s introduction to the White House, Donald Rumsfeld (former congressman, former White House chief of staff, and former secretary of defense) joined the Reagan transition team. At that time, and from 1977 to 1985, Rumsfeld was the president and CEO of G.D. Searle, mainly because of his influence within the White House!

In January 1981, Rumsfeld expressed that his mission was to get Aspartame approved by the end of the year. On January 25th, the day the new president took office, the previous FDA commissioner’s authority was suspended, and the next month, the commissioner’s job went to Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes.

Hayes was a medical doctor, a professor, and a Defense Department contract researcher.
In July 1981, Hayes approved Aspartame as a food additive despite a strong recommendation from an FDA Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) to do otherwise.

Two years later, Hayes’ last decision was the approval of Aspartame for soft drinks and carbonated beverages.

As a Congressional Record, Senate, S5497, May 7, l985 states:

“Hayes’ decisions to approve Aspartame for use in dry foods such as cereals in l981 and soft drinks in l983 does not square with the role the FDA is supposed to play. The FDA is the government agency that reviews and approves all tests submitted by companies before allowing food additives on the market. The law requires a manufacturer – in this case Searle – to prove to the satisfaction of the FDA that there is a “reasonable certainty” that a food additive is safe. The government does not have to prove that it is harmful – an important distinction. If tests are inconclusive, an additive is not supposed to be approved by the FDA.”

Following the approval of Aspartame in soft drinks and after being under fire for accepting corporate gifts, Hayes left the FDA and went to Searle’s public relations firm (Burston-Marsteller) as senior medical advisor where he was allegedly paid $1,000 per day!

Shortly after the FDA soft-drink approval (1983), Searle began test marketing aspartame, and complaints began to arrive at the FDA of such reactions as dizziness, blurred vision, headaches, and seizures. The complaints were more numerous and more serious than the agency had ever received on any food additive.

In 1985, the FDA asked the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to review the first 650 complaints (there are now over 10,000). The CDC found that the more than 92 symptoms in approximately 25% of the complainants had stopped and then restarted, corresponding with a respective stop and then restart, either purposely or by accident, of Aspartame consumption.

Considering Aspartame’s economic potential (more than $1 billion/year in profit), Monsanto, the world’s largest conventional seed and agricultural biotechnology company, purchased Searle late in 1985 (although later selling it in 2000). In this merger, Searle’s Aspartame business became a separate Monsanto subsidiary, the NutraSweet Company – a name coined by Searle lawyer, Robert Shapiro, who subsequently became president and CEO of Monsanto.

Donald Rumsfeld reportedly earned $12 million from increased stock value when G. D. Searle & Company was sold to Monsanto!

By 1993, Aspartame had outrageously been approved for use in other beverages, baked goods, and confectionary goods. In 1996, the FDA removed all restrictions from Aspartame allowing it to be used in all foods!

Amazingly, Aspartame has also been investigated and approved by the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives of the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization and by the World Health Organization.

STAY TUNED FOR PART 2 (coming tomorrow) where we’ll look at the dangers of aspartame. You won’t want miss it!

 

References:

Food Chemical News, June 12, 1995, Page 27.

http://presidiotex.com/bressler/

http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/answers/ans00772.html

http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_interacts.htm

Mark Mazzetti; Richard J. Newman; Kenneth T. Walsh; Kevin Whitelaw; Jeff Glasser (2001-12-17). “Rumsfeld Way”, U.S. News & World Report, p. 20.

Debunking the “Official Aspartame Myth, http://www.dorway.com/offasprt.html